#archlinux32 | Logs for 2019-10-24

Back
[00:00:17] -!- yans has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
[00:32:32] -!- thePiGrepper has joined #archlinux32
[00:53:56] -!- samantaz has quit [Ping timeout: 276 seconds]
[01:00:35] -!- samantaz has joined #archlinux32
[01:06:26] <buildmaster> i686/rust is broken (says eurobuild6-1): https://archlinux32.org
[02:30:33] <buildmaster> pentium4/rust is broken (says eurobuild6-2): https://archlinux32.org
[02:56:39] -!- samantaz has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
[07:54:26] -!- thePiGrepper has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
[08:04:02] -!- davor has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
[08:06:54] -!- abaumann has joined #archlinux32
[08:06:54] <buildmaster> Hi abaumann!
[08:06:54] <buildmaster> !rq abaumann
[08:06:56] <phrik> buildmaster: <abaumann> all slaves busy.. wait.. one slave in the north/western part of.. resists.. :-)
[08:20:32] -!- deep42thought has joined #archlinux32
[08:20:32] <buildmaster> Hi deep42thought!
[08:20:32] <buildmaster> !rq deep42thought
[08:20:34] <phrik> buildmaster: <deep42thought> windows suggests swap on external usb sticks :-)
[08:20:49] <deep42thought> good morning!
[08:40:45] <abaumann> morning deep42thought
[08:41:00] <abaumann> yeah, pyalpm fails indeed
[08:41:19] <deep42thought> It does not fail upstream (I already checked)
[08:41:24] <abaumann> let's see if we can throw this upstream..
[08:41:25] <abaumann> ok.
[08:41:25] <buildmaster> i686/rust is broken (says eurobuild6-1): https://archlinux32.org
[08:41:32] <deep42thought> but besides that, I was too busy to have a deeper look into it
[08:41:35] <abaumann> so, python is broken?
[08:41:49] <deep42thought> I guess, it's some module-path-finding logic that is broken
[08:41:49] <abaumann> python2 I think is
[08:41:55] <buildmaster> pentium4/rust is broken (says eurobuild6-2): https://archlinux32.org
[08:41:58] <deep42thought> but it's really just a guess
[08:43:12] <abaumann> I'm doing rust rebuilds on two special build slaves of mine..
[08:43:28] <abaumann> ..if this succeeds, we can switch back (hopefully) to more or less normal rust builds.
[08:43:30] <deep42thought> what's special about them?
[08:43:47] <abaumann> they use my bootstrapped rust 1.38 (bootstrapped from rust-bin 1.37)
[08:43:54] <deep42thought> ok
[08:43:57] <abaumann> and now I'm testing the rebuilding ot 1.38 with itself
[08:44:05] <deep42thought> :-)
[08:44:10] <abaumann> which was fixed upstream
[08:44:41] <abaumann> the i686 version will remain shacky, I'm afraid, as rust-bin itself doesn't exist for i686 (non-SSE2)
[08:45:12] * abaumann believes in designed obsolesence in computer technology
[08:45:24] <deep42thought> !grab abaumann
[08:45:25] <phrik> deep42thought: Bingpot!
[08:46:05] <abaumann> pyalpm doesn't build for me, it fails in patches
[08:46:08] <abaumann> also for 64-bit
[08:46:13] <deep42thought> huh?
[08:46:24] <deep42thought> it built for me sucessfully yesterday
[08:46:32] <abaumann> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'setuptools'
[08:47:07] <abaumann> ah. patching suceeds, but with croaks.
[08:47:16] <abaumann> python-setuptools missing in the makedepends?
[08:47:20] <abaumann> no. same eror
[08:47:32] <abaumann> ah..
[08:47:52] <abaumann> the problem is: trunk is fixed, extra not.
[08:48:01] <deep42thought> ?
[08:48:04] <deep42thought> I never build trunk
[08:48:13] <deep42thought> ... works over here
[08:48:25] <abaumann> I'm using asp32 -u
[08:48:27] <abaumann> export
[08:48:32] <abaumann> maybe there is a bug somewhere there?
[08:48:37] <deep42thought> yes, probably
[08:48:53] <deep42thought> did you run `asp32 update`?
[08:49:29] <abaumann> thought so, yes.
[08:50:05] <deep42thought> looks good over here
[08:50:09] <abaumann> I redid my chroots
[08:50:23] <deep42thought> ah, that might be it :-)
[08:50:50] <abaumann> but, if the 64-bit build chroots would fails, somebody should notice fast :-)
[08:50:58] <deep42thought> yes
[08:51:08] <deep42thought> I just tried to build again, and it works flawlessly
[08:51:22] <abaumann> ==> WARNING: PACKAGER should have the format 'Example Name <email@address.invalid>'
[08:51:29] <abaumann> tons of warnings :-)
[08:51:35] <deep42thought> new pacman features
[08:51:47] <abaumann> as long this is the only surprise..
[08:51:48] <deep42thought> that's your /etc/makepkg.conf ;-)
[08:52:32] <abaumann> yeah. but on the buildmaster? seriously?
[08:53:14] <abaumann> prioritize-build-list is complaining.
[08:53:45] * deep42thought takes a look
[08:54:12] <deep42thought> what command are you using?
[08:54:22] <abaumann> ah. seed-build-list
[08:54:31] <abaumann> or prioritize-build-list
[08:54:41] <deep42thought> $ prioritize-build-list <(echo '^pyalpm$')
[08:54:41] <deep42thought> 1
[08:54:43] <abaumann> most likely the first one is showing the warning
[08:54:44] <deep42thought> ... no complaints
[08:54:55] <abaumann> then it's the seed
[08:55:05] <deep42thought> probably the makepkg --printsrcinfo
[08:55:09] <deep42thought> I'll try ...
[08:55:46] <deep42thought> indeed
[09:48:29] <deep42thought> ok, I submitted a patch for makepkg - let's see if Allan likes it :-)
[09:48:43] <abaumann> mmh. manual makepkg works with pypalm, staging-x86_64-build not, so the bug must be somewhere there..
[09:48:47] <abaumann> devtools update?
[09:49:05] <deep42thought> manual makepkg with [staging]?
[09:49:20] <abaumann> ah.
[09:49:23] <abaumann> hang on
[09:49:29] <abaumann> didn't have staging in there..
[09:59:40] <deep42thought> pyalpm does not build with testing-pentium4-build, either
[10:03:20] <abaumann> testing-x86_64-build works, staging-x86_64-build not
[10:03:39] <deep42thought> x86_64, sure?
[10:03:43] <abaumann> yes
[10:03:50] <abaumann> let me compare the package versions
[10:04:04] <deep42thought> well, we actually don't care about upstream's tesing or staging
[10:04:13] <deep42thought> because our staging is upstream's stable
[10:04:21] <abaumann> yes, but out bug could be their bug. :-)
[10:04:23] <abaumann> *our
[10:04:28] <deep42thought> no
[10:04:37] <deep42thought> if extra-x86_64-build works, it could not
[10:05:12] <abaumann> mmh
[10:06:16] <abaumann> extra-x86_64-build works
[10:06:40] <abaumann> so something entered both our staging (something from the Python universe) breaking staging.
[10:14:47] <abaumann> python 3.7.4-2, python 3.8.0-1
[10:14:55] <abaumann> and all python modules were not rebuild.
[10:15:17] <abaumann> I slowly seriously start to doubt certain procedure applied upstream..
[10:15:24] <abaumann> *procedures
[10:15:46] <abaumann> python 3.8 could need some partial bootstrapping
[10:16:01] <abaumann> well, as you said, not our problem. :-)
[10:16:44] <abaumann> so, I have now 2-3 hours of rust building for nothing.. *sigh*
[10:16:56] <abaumann> it will fail in the end in the namcap check
[10:24:40] <deep42thought> replace namcap by /usr/bin/true
[10:26:42] <abaumann> hehe :->
[10:26:51] <abaumann> good idea.
[10:33:59] -!- davor has joined #archlinux32
[10:56:29] <deep42thought> hmm, on my test vm, pyalpm fails to compile in build() :-/
[10:56:40] <deep42thought> src/package.c:282:37: error: ‘alpm_pkg_get_deltas’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘alpm_pkg_get_files’?
[10:56:57] <abaumann> so, an API mismatch?
[10:58:03] <deep42thought> looks like one, yes
[10:58:19] <deep42thought> oh
[10:58:23] <deep42thought> it's an old version
[10:58:31] <deep42thought> somehow the git is not updated ...
[10:59:59] <deep42thought> `asp32 update` choked on deleted upstream references
[11:00:07] <abaumann> oh.
[11:00:30] <deep42thought> upstream asp probably would have done the same
[11:00:42] <abaumann> yeah. suppose so
[11:08:05] <deep42thought> ARRRGH
[11:08:10] <deep42thought> I found the check() issue
[11:08:23] <deep42thought> it only works, if the package is already installed
[11:08:37] <abaumann> ah. sweet.
[11:08:37] <deep42thought> e.g. building with --nocheck, installing and building again (with check()) works
[11:08:50] <abaumann> a new straw?
[11:08:58] <deep42thought> without_check is already a straw
[11:09:09] <deep42thought> we should open a bug upstream probably
[11:09:19] <deep42thought> because the testsuite is most probably ill-formulated
[11:09:38] <deep42thought> (it seems to check the system pyalpm, not the compiled one)
[11:09:49] <abaumann> yep. that's a bad thing
[11:10:04] <deep42thought> but we should be able to prove that thing on x86_64, first
[11:12:29] <deep42thought> hmm, no, on x86_64 it also works with an old pyalpm
[11:15:45] <buildmaster> pentium4/texlab is broken (says nlopc43): https://archlinux32.org
[11:30:04] <buildmaster> i686/texlab is broken (says nlopc46): https://archlinux32.org
[12:39:46] <abaumann> jippie. newsboat works on the T240X, so rust i686 builds code without SSE2
[12:40:30] <abaumann> rescheduling librsvg (which has SSE2 issues since a long time)
[12:41:35] <nit-picker> deep42thought: your slave rechenknecht builds i686/virtualbox for more than a day, now (1 day(s) 08:23:59)
[13:43:26] -!- thePiGrepper has joined #archlinux32
[13:44:39] <deep42thought> abaumann: that's good news :-)
[14:49:59] <nit-picker> deep42thought: your slave nlopc46-i486bs0 builds i486/libopenshot-audio for more than a day, now (1 day(s) 08:23:26)
[15:08:30] <abaumann> yea. but new mesa or whatever now distorts my Siliconmotion X11 driver.
[15:09:25] <abaumann> maybe recompilation helps./.
[15:18:08] <abaumann> nope
[15:18:21] <abaumann> another mesa xorg glitch, the thing really falls apart..
[15:19:45] <abaumann> aha. EXA is broken.
[15:20:01] <deep42thought> This is a kind of camera?
[15:20:12] <abaumann> EXA is an acceleration method in Xorg drivers
[15:20:28] <abaumann> Siliconmotion seems to have had issues before with acceleration, so..
[15:20:45] <abaumann> LXDE works, geany woks. nothing is crashing.
[15:20:51] <abaumann> nice laptop with 128 MB RAM.
[15:21:23] <abaumann> I can develop in an IDE, run qemu for my own operating system. compile the operating system in 10 seconds. But I cannot open a single web page with any browser (maybe dillo)
[15:21:27] <abaumann> this is progress. :-)
[15:21:37] <deep42thought> :-D
[15:22:03] <deep42thought> this is, why I'm gradually switching to text-only internet applications
[15:22:08] <abaumann> I see a real niche here: write a browser which doesn't completly suck.
[15:22:15] <deep42thought> !grab abaumann
[15:22:16] <phrik> deep42thought: Tada!
[15:24:10] <abaumann> Mmh: "The default acceleration method is XAA". Ok. Let's try that..
[15:24:53] <abaumann> yeah. and KVM mode setting broken when going back to text mode..
[15:25:03] <abaumann> ..that should be easy fixable.
[15:25:17] <abaumann> XAA works.
[15:33:50] -!- oaken-source has quit [Ping timeout: 265 seconds]
[15:34:08] -!- oaken-source has joined #archlinux32
[15:45:22] <abaumann> Feels like tinicore linux, but with newest kernel, systemd and modern software. :-)
[15:45:35] <abaumann> I like actually tinicorelinux as an idea..
[15:45:42] <abaumann> ..not a rant (for once) :-)
[16:03:07] <nit-picker> deep42thought: your slave buildknecht builds pentium4/chromium for more than a day, now (1 day(s) 10:43:23)
[16:08:31] <nit-picker> abaumann: your slave eurobuild6-5 builds i686/grafana for more than a day, now (2 day(s) 13:48:27)
[16:15:03] -!- deep42thought has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
[16:18:56] -!- thePiGrepper has quit [Ping timeout: 268 seconds]
[16:40:58] <buildmaster> pentium4/firefox is broken (says eurobuild6-2): https://archlinux32.org
[16:46:08] <buildmaster> i686/firefox is broken (says buildknecht2): https://archlinux32.org
[16:56:28] -!- thePiGrepper has joined #archlinux32
[17:25:36] <nit-picker> deep42thought: your slave nlopc46-i486bs1 builds i486/svt-hevc for more than a day, now (1 day(s) 10:59:58)
[17:29:05] <buildmaster> i686/thunderbird is broken (says eurobuild6-4) - already flagged out-of day upstream on 2019-10-10: https://archlinux32.org
[17:29:24] <buildmaster> pentium4/thunderbird is broken (says eurobuild6-6) - already flagged out-of day upstream on 2019-10-10: https://archlinux32.org
[17:34:10] -!- abaumann has quit [Quit: leaving]
[17:38:51] <nit-picker> deep42thought: your slave buildknecht2 builds i686/chromium for more than a day, now (1 day(s) 12:25:28)
[17:38:53] <buildmaster> i486/qt5-mqtt is broken (says nlopc46-i486bs1): https://archlinux32.org
[17:46:20] <buildmaster> i686/firefox is broken (says eurobuild6-1): https://archlinux32.org
[17:58:03] <buildmaster> pentium4/firefox is broken (says rechenknecht): https://archlinux32.org
[17:58:46] -!- isacdaavid has joined #archlinux32
[18:06:50] <nit-picker> deep42thought: your slave nlopc46 builds pentium4/knemo for more than a day, now (1 day(s) 11:37:12)
[18:19:47] -!- davor has quit [Quit: Bye]
[18:21:04] -!- davor has joined #archlinux32
[19:09:15] -!- samantaz has joined #archlinux32
[23:22:57] -!- isacdaavid has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
[23:52:50] -!- thePiGrepper has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]