#archlinux32 | Logs for 2020-10-30

Back
[01:00:06] -!- charims has joined #archlinux32
[01:45:17] -!- drathir_tor has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
[01:46:29] -!- drathir_tor has joined #archlinux32
[03:59:03] -!- drathir_tor has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
[05:06:20] -!- drathir_tor has joined #archlinux32
[05:24:23] -!- drathir_tor has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
[05:25:01] -!- drathir_tor has joined #archlinux32
[07:00:05] <girls> bill-auger: the version is the same, but the pkgrel is not
[07:00:29] <girls> because the pkgrel differs in the integer part, this is something, that comes from upstream arch linux
[07:00:35] <girls> so you have to look at their git
[07:01:15] <girls> https://github.com
[07:01:17] <phrik> Title: History for trunk - archlinux/svntogit-community · GitHub (at github.com)
[07:02:24] <girls> our package website also has the link to the old cgit of archlinux
[07:02:38] <girls> let me check, whether that still works
[07:04:23] <girls> https://git.archlinux.org
[07:04:24] <phrik> Title: svntogit/community.git - Git clone of the 'community' repository (at git.archlinux.org)
[07:04:26] <girls> yup, still works
[07:04:54] <girls> so starting from https://www.archlinux32.org you can reach all the interesting information :-)
[07:04:57] <phrik> Title: Arch Linux 32 - lxappearance-obconf-gtk3 0.2.3-2.7 (pentium4) (at www.archlinux32.org)
[07:36:43] -!- drathir_tor has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
[07:59:12] -!- drathir_tor has joined #archlinux32
[09:05:21] <bill-auger> girls: maybe you misunderstood my question - i wanted to know why there is a package in testing, if the PKGBUILD is not difference from arch, and is not difference between the one in community and community-testing, then why is it rebuilt in community-testing?
[09:06:52] <bill-auger> on x86_64, that program is broken - it segfaults immediately on startup - i assume it is the same for arch32
[09:07:54] <bill-auger> i fixed today - when i asked that question, i was only looking for clues
[09:12:50] <bill-auger> wondering if maybe it was an attrempt to fix the same bug
[09:19:55] -!- abaumann has joined #archlinux32
[09:19:56] <buildmaster> Hi abaumann!
[09:19:56] <buildmaster> !rq abaumann
[09:19:57] <phrik> buildmaster: <abaumann> wow. I don't know if this library has more bugs or CVEs..
[09:32:50] -!- Alina-malina has quit [Ping timeout: 272 seconds]
[09:34:24] -!- Alina-malina has joined #archlinux32
[09:41:14] -!- abaumann has quit [Quit: leaving]
[10:06:47] <girls> bill-auger: in that case, I misunderstood your question and probably still don't quite understand it
[10:07:57] <girls> as far as I see, the package was rebuild on arch due to "reproducibility", which sounds like nothing changed in the PKGBUILD and they wanted to verify, that it builds reproducibly (possibly some dependency changed and that changed the binary package)
[10:08:40] <girls> as far as arch32 is concerned, we build all packages from upstream blindly, put them into staging, soon after into testing and then they move to stable (=[community] in this case)
[10:08:59] <girls> so we simply picked up the rebuild of upstream and it is stuck in [community-testing] currently
[10:09:14] <girls> and because upstream has not changed their PKGBUILD, neither have we
[10:09:45] <girls> regarding your question if we attempted to fix that bug, you link to git is the right source of information
[10:11:25] <girls> and it shows, that we do not have checked in any changes for lxappearance-obconf-gtk3
[10:11:41] <girls> (which is also evident on the package site)
[10:12:48] <girls> in case you have fixed a bug, we're allways happy about patches :-)
[12:35:43] -!- drathir_tor has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
[12:57:59] -!- drathir_tor has joined #archlinux32
[14:36:23] -!- drathir_tor has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
[15:02:11] -!- drathir_tor has joined #archlinux32
[19:32:56] <bill-auger> there is no 'lxappearance-obconf-gtk3' in arch community-testing though - that is what i assumed you guys were doing something with it intentionally
[19:33:54] <bill-auger> this is the email with the details about the bug https://sourceforge.net
[19:33:57] <phrik> Title: LXDE - Lightweight X Desktop Environment / Thread: [Lxde-list] [PATCH]: avoid segfault in 'lxappearance-obconf'' (at sourceforge.net)
[19:36:18] <bill-auger> try it yourself - like most LXDE programs, they have minimal requirements - just install 'lxappearance-obconf-gtk3' then run lxappearance - if you get a segfault, apply the 'gtk3-theme-preview-segfault.patch' patch - the 'gtk3-theme-preview-hise.patch' patch only duplicates the sed command in the arch PKGBUILD
[19:37:58] <bill-auger> or just wait to see if the arch packager does anything - there is a bug report about it but it was closed - i dont know why; becuase the bug is still present and the package is still useless - i requested that it be re-opened https://bugs.archlinux.org
[19:37:58] <phrik> Title: FS#65898 : [lxappearance-gtk3] Segmentation fault when executing the app (at bugs.archlinux.org)
[19:41:56] <bill-auger> what the 'gtk3-theme-preview-hide.patch' patch really accomplishes is that 'lxappearance-obconf' and 'lxappearance-obconf-gtk3' could be (and probably was) a split package; but now there is a separate PKGBUILD for -gtk3, due to the crude patching approach - with the source patched properly, they could be merged again
[20:11:01] -!- girls has quit [Quit: ZNC 1.7.5 - https://znc.in]
[20:11:45] -!- girls has joined #archlinux32
[20:11:45] <buildmaster> Hi girls!
[20:11:45] <buildmaster> !rq girls
[20:11:46] <phrik> buildmaster: <girls> isn't that a typo? shouldn't it be "haskell-base-combat-batteries"?
[21:04:42] -!- drathir_tor has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
[21:04:59] -!- drathir_tor has joined #archlinux32
[21:30:26] -!- drathir_tor has quit [Remote host closed the connection]
[21:30:42] -!- drathir_tor has joined #archlinux32